Recently I ran across a brilliant list of actions Fake Biden should've taken instantly if he really wanted to destroy President Trump and his legacy. Some actions he did take but failed miserably. Some, especially stopping the Durham Investigation, Fake Biden inexplicably didn't even attempt!
Then I lost the list. I'm talking a massive Middle Aged moment. I couldn't even remember where I'd seen it and I panicked because it was the perfect information to share with you, the AMERICA: The Blog family.
Dismayed, I posted a "Have You Seen This List" on Free Atlantis. Have you been there!?! It's the best group of patriots I've ever run across. Informed, intelligent, cheerful, kind, welcoming, positive, grounded...no hopium. Everything you want in a Patriot Community.
Where was I? Oh yes! A couple other patriots responded, "Yes, we saw the list too. Can't remember where though." Ah! A collective Middle Aged moment! And so the matter sat, nagging at me, gnawing at me. I couldn't let it go!
Suddenly, a few days later, one of the patriots on Free Atlantis contact me out of nowhere with the very list I'd been so frantic to find! Such kindness. He's obviously been taking his ginkgo biloba. I thanked him over and over.
The list was written by a Free Atlantis member known as "SLAG" for his substack (blog), The Pipeline, in a series of articles entitled The Wartime Presidency. He kindly gave me permission to share it with you.
If you have the attention span of a...oh look! a squirrel!...like me, here's a screenshot of the long lost list of Biden's weird oversights and failures. If you have the time and patience, scroll down to read SLAG's article in its entirety.
As you're reading, take one thing into consideration: We don't actually know if President Trump signed the Insurrection Act before leaving the White House or not. I've heard yes, no and maybe on that topic. Ooooh, tantalizing thought!
All through this I can’t get around the nagging feeling that we’re not thinking BIG enough.
First, I’m going to ask you to table (for now) everything you know about election law and the US Constitution. We cannot look to either for answers for what I’m about to discuss.
On Free Atlantis & other platforms: Andre, Duane & Brian Cates, Kyle (Just_Human_7), Patel Patriot, Praying Medic (Dave Hayes), Dave from the X22 report, and many others have been speculating about how the Stolen 2020 election can be returned to its rightful winner - Donald J Trump.
When this is all over, all of us are going to be partially correct in our analysis.
We are all looking at a chessboard in a box - we cannot see the individual moves, but occasionally we get to see a snapshot of the game (sometimes only a piece of the board). We must speculate about what moves occurred in between and what moves are coming next.
What I’m going to show you over a several part series of articles is a possible “last resort” or “fail safe” scenario by which Trump could come back to the White House. Please keep this in mind: this is one of several possible avenues that Trump might use to reclaim the presidency, it’s certainly not a prediction. Right now, no one can predict what might happen - not even Trump.
Why is the Constitution not relevant to this scenario?
Because it’s recently occurred to me that the US was invaded by an enemy nation in 2020 - and that invasion displaced a legitimate, legally elected government.
I know that sounds absurd but stick with me for a minute.
This invasion wasn’t in the traditional sense, with ships, aircraft, troops, and tanks: it was with social media, corrupted politicians, voting machines, a virus, and protesters.
Consider the following known enemy actions:
The Central Powers (Nazi Germany & Fascist Italy) in WW2 did this all the time in countries they occupied:
Ladies and gentlemen - look at that list of fails!
If this is a puppet government, this is the absolute worst and [most] ineffective one I’ve ever seen.
It’s almost if China would have done better had they decided to stay out of the 2020 election and left Trump where he was. (Hint: That’s classic Trump - when dealing with Donald J Trump, always take the first deal and negotiate. You never tell this man "no" if you want to win.) We see a contradiction here:
I like contradictions. They’re always an indicator that you’re right over something interesting. Contradictions are a cheerleading squad that pump up your enthusiasm to keep digging in your research and reasoning.
Consider this with me:
Ordinarily, a successful invasion and installation of a puppet government would mean the invaders would get whatever they wanted.
But here’s the thing - they’re not. The fact that China and Iran keep losing right along with the Neofacists is a huge data point. It begs the question: If their victory was complete, why do they keep losing?
Here’s a possible answer:
The invasion was through subterfuge, corruption, propaganda, and electronic means - not physical force with soldiers and weapons.
Therefore it’s inherently unstable.
This wasn’t a traditional invasion: it was done electronically and through politics and media. As a result, there’s no enemy holding force here in the US. Oh, there are enemy agents, that’s a foregone conclusion - what I’m talking about is a holding force with enough equipment and soldiers to occupy all 50 states. That force doesn’t exist. The enemy’s strength is also his weakness.
If states and American citizens simply refuse to cooperate or refuse to do what they’re told - the enemy can’t really do anything about it. Remember there aren’t soldiers here, so if Texas decides to defy the puppet administration - China cannot send an armored division to Austin and arrest a bunch of people and stomp those Texans back into line.
If this premise is true, then this situation has no precedent in US history. We’ve been looking to the Constitution to provide a roadmap and a way out of this quagmire, and it can provide some answers of how we might emerge: but, the Constitution ISN’T the place to look for HOW Trump gets the White House back.
If that’s the case, what we’re seeing goes far beyond a presidential election. If I’m reading the situation correctly, Trump has hinted that the world is at war.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, World War 3 started in late 2019.
In this series of articles, we are going to try to answer the following questions:
Until next time,
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
Click here to learn more about Lenora Thompson: wife, caregiver, writer, patriot.
As a caregiver, donations to AMERICA: The Blog